Jump to content

Tendulkar versus Kallis


zen

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dravid won more Test matches for us than Sachin, then I wonder why Sachin is being treated like God.
Poor second innings average means Sachin was not a match winner in crunch situations.

Sent from my CPH1819 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

tendulkar stats vs these bowlers:

Involving any of the players CEL Ambrose (WI) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or JM Anderson (ENG) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SE Bond (NZ) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or GD McGrath (AUS) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SM Pollock (SA) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or Shoaib Akhtar (PAK) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or DW Steyn (SA) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or CA Walsh (WI) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SK Warne (AUS) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or Wasim Akram (PAK) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif   just add in alan donald as well and stuart broad. sorry

 

44.51

 

and 

 

45.20 excluding games involving bond away from home because kalis dint play shane bond away from him

 

n Australia 1992-2000 5 449 148* 56.12 2 4 2/10 25.50 0 2 0 30.62 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in England 2007-2011 7 501 91 35.78 0 1 1/26 180.00 0 6 0 -144.21 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in India 1994-2010 27 2156 179 47.91 8 11 3/10 43.45 0 12 0 4.45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in New Zealand 2002-2002 2 100 51 25.00 0 - - - - 1 0 - http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Pakistan 1989-2006 10 483 194* 40.25 1 4 2/36 44.75 0 6 0 -4.49 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in South Africa 1996-2011 11 959 169 50.47 4 3 1/9 58.66 0 6 0 -8.19 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in West Indies 1997-1997 5 289 92 57.80 0 0 - - 0 5 0 -

 

 

very good. he only struggled vs swing bowlers like anderson and fast swingers like bond. Although those pitches were atrocious. keep in mind. kalis dint have to play on such dreadful pitches in nz.

but now accounting for all bowlers barring south african ones. his stats are:

 

average

45.69

 

very solid

 

 

now for the brilliant kalis:

 

average of 46.67 vs

the bowling of :

Involving any of the players CEL Ambrose (WI) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or JM Anderson (ENG) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SE Bond (NZ) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SCJ Broad (ENG) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or Harbhajan Singh (INDIA) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif  or GD McGrath (AUS) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or Shoaib Akhtar (PAK) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or S Sreesanth (INDIA) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or CA Walsh (WI) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or SK Warne (AUS) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif or Wasim Akram (PAK) http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruRemove.gif add in kumble as well. sorry

 

and 43 when kumble played. indians dint have great pace bowlers till 2015 - 2020.

bowing average of: 32

 

but remember kalis doesnt have to play his own teammates. teammates which included 2 of the great bowlers of our generation. donald and steyn. 

 

so average vs good non indian bowlers; 

his average is:

 

40.78

 

Not that great.  

 

 

in Australia 1997-2006 9 728 111 48.53 2 12 3/45 47.00 0 9 0 1.53 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in England 2003-2012 10 554 182* 32.58 1 28 6/54 29.89 1 12 0 2.69 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Pakistan 2003-2003 1 47 29 23.50 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in South Africa 1997-2010 24 1830 186 44.63 5 51 5/90 30.47 1 27 0 14.16 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in West Indies 2001-2001 5 267 53 29.66 0 20 6/67 19.75 1 4 0 9.91

 

 

ALSO bear in mind kalis never played shane bond away from home. He only played him at home and averaged 66 in that game. 

 

 

SO excluding new zealand, kalis's average drops to a mediocre rahane overall average of

 

39.16

 

https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/45789.html?class=1;filter=advanced;home_or_away=1;home_or_away=2;home_or_away=3;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=4;opposition=6;opposition=7;orderby=default;player_involve=10829;player_involve=1765;player_involve=1775;player_involve=1884;player_involve=2000;player_involve=2101;player_involve=48440;player_involve=5649;template=results;type=allround

 

 

so in conclusion. I was wrong. kalis was better vs india compared to sachin against saffers. However against the rest of the field, sachin was the superior batsman. 

 

but overall as a package kalis is obviously better since he is an all rounder that averaged 31 vs the aforementioned top sides. 

 

AS a pure batsman, seems like tendulkar has the advantage. But this is discounting other factors like clutch ability, second innings average and ability to perform damage control duty when the player in question has to come in early to face the new ball due to poor opening performances by teammates. 

 

in terms of second innings performances, i would say kalis has a slight edge as he averages 50 in 4th innings. 

 

 

Edited by Jay
Posted

Why Kallis wasn't rated highly. Phase of Kallis' career (As posted by someone else earlier).

 

First 6 years

Kallis averaged 41 in first 50 tests, so that also went against him creating his first impression. Most ATG show their greatness during first 50 tests, SRT, Lara, Viv or potential ATGs like Root, Williamson, Kohli or Root. Ponting (mid 40s) and Sanga (48) were attacking batsmen which helped them change impression when hit their peak.
 

First 6 years, many poor series, slow boring batting, nothing much to show except that 100 against against McGrath from 1995-2001.

 

2001-02

Then he goes to Zimbabwe and scores big. 388 unbeaten runs.
Then a good series in India but no hundred. 2 series against Aus, again no 100s.

Then Bangladesh series and again scores unbeaten 214.
After that 9 tests against Pakistan, SL, Eng and failures in both overseas tours of Eng and Pak with 1 100 in home tour.

 

2002-03
Then he hit a big series against WI with 700 runs. Those are his first 8 years of career, 71 tests.
During this phase he averaged in 30s against, Aus, Eng, Pak and SL.
Scoring 4k runs at avg of 41 against top 7 teams and that too at SR of 38 with just 7 100s meant he was just improving his reputation during later years as a batsman.

It's not difficult to see why he wasn't rated much. Of course he was just unstoppable during later years. But people initial impression of player remains for so long as cricket fans follow sports for decades.

 

Just like many batsmen who struggled during 1990-2002 and suddenly hit gold form in flattest era (2003-2013) of cricket, Kallis the batsman was one of the big time beneficiary of the that. 

 

Kallis's stats during this phase

 

Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1995-2013 166 280 40 13289 224 55.37 28903 45.97 45 58 16 1488 97 Profile
filtered 1995-2003 65 110 13 3993 160 41.16 10379 38.47 7 24 5 439 17  
Career summary
Grouping Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
v Australia 1997-2002 12 23 2 685 101 32.61 1731 39.57 1 4 1 77 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v England 1995-2003 15 22 1 787 132 37.47 2060 38.20 2 4 2 81 5 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v India 2000-2001 4 7 3 338 95 84.50 968 34.91 0 3 0 35 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v New Zealand 1999-2000 6 9 2 463 160 66.14 1005 46.06 2 1 0 69 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v Pakistan 1997-2003 8 12 0 456 105 38.00 1125 40.53 1 2 0 52 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v Sri Lanka 1998-2002 10 17 1 512 87 32.00 1360 37.64 0 3 1 53 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v West Indies 1998-2001 10 20 4 752 110 47.00 2130 35.30 1 7 1 72 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
in Australia 1997-2002 6 12 1 452 101 41.09 1164 38.83 1 2 0 41 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in England 1998-2003 8 13 0 482 132 37.07 1112 43.34 1 2 1 56 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in India 2000-2000 2 3 1 136 95 68.00 497 27.36 0 1 0 13 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in New Zealand 1999-1999 3 4 1 176 148* 58.66 416 42.30 1 0 0 22 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Pakistan 1997-2003 3 5 0 161 61 32.20 417 38.60 0 1 0 17 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in South Africa 1995-2003 35 57 9 2128 160 44.33 5480 38.83 4 14 2 241 7 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Sri Lanka 2000-2000 3 6 0 191 87 31.83 454 42.07 0 1 1 19 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in West Indies 2001-2001 5 10 1 267 53 29.66 839 31.82 0 3 1 30 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
in Africa 1995-2003 35 57 9 2128 160 44.33 5480 38.83 4 14 2 241 7 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Americas 2001-2001 5 10 1 267 53 29.66 839 31.82 0 3 1 30 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Asia 1997-2003 8 14 1 488 95 37.53 1368 35.67 0 3 1 49 4 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Europe 1998-2003 8 13 0 482 132 37.07 1112 43.34 1 2 1 56 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Oceania 1997-2002 9 16 2 628 148* 44.85 1580 39.74 2 2 0 63 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
home 1995-2003 35 57 9 2128 160 44.33 5480 38.83 4 14 2 241 7 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
away 1997-2003 30 53 4 1865 148* 38.06 4899 38.06 3 10 3 198 10

 

 

Look at those averages. He was avg batsman in most of the countries for first 8 years of his career. 3 away centuries and all this at slow SR. No wonder he wasn't rated highly. 

 

Sachin during same phase

Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0  
unfiltered 1989-2013 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78 51 68 14 Profile
filtered 1989-2003 97 158 14 7946 217 55.18 28 33 9  
Career summary
Grouping Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0  
v Australia 1991-2001 15 28 2 1406 177 54.07 6 5 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v England 1990-2002 16 24 2 1683 193 76.50 6 8 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v New Zealand 1990-2003 16 27 5 1062 217 48.27 3 5 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v Pakistan 1989-1999 7 12 0 395 136 32.91 1 2 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v South Africa 1992-2001 14 26 1 948 169 37.92 3 3 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v Sri Lanka 1990-1999 13 16 2 1124 148 80.28 6 3 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
v West Indies 1994-2002 16 25 2 1328 179 57.73 3 7 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
in Australia 1991-2000 8 15 1 646 148* 46.14 3 2 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in England 1990-2002 10 16 1 1074 193 71.60 4 4 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in India 1990-2003 42 70 7 3587 217 56.93 12 14 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in New Zealand 1990-2002 8 13 1 498 113 41.50 1 3 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Pakistan 1989-1989 4 6 0 215 59 35.83 0 2 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in South Africa 1992-2001 9 16 1 636 169 42.40 3 1 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Sri Lanka 1993-1999 6 8 2 670 143 111.66 4 2 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in West Indies 1997-2002 10 14 1 620 117 47.69 1 5 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
in Africa 1992-2001 9 16 1 636 169 42.40 3 1 1 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Americas 1997-2002 10 14 1 620 117 47.69 1 5 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Asia 1989-2003 52 84 9 4472 217 59.62 16 18 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Europe 1990-2002 10 16 1 1074 193 71.60 4 4 0 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
in Oceania 1990-2002 16 28 2 1144 148* 44.00 4 5 2 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
 
home 1990-2003 42 70 7 3587 217 56.93 12 14 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
away 1989-2002 55 88 7 4359 193 53.81 16 19 6

 

 

He had already established himself as an ATG batsman by that time.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

Why Kallis wasn't rated highly. Phase of Kallis' career (As posted by someone else earlier).

 

First 6 years

Kallis averaged 41 in first 50 tests, so that also went against him creating his first impression. Most ATG show their greatness during first 50 tests, SRT, Lara, Viv or potential ATGs like Root, Williamson, Kohli or Root. Ponting (mid 40s) and Sanga (48) were attacking batsmen which helped them change impression when hit their peak.
 

First 6 years, many poor series, slow boring batting, nothing much to show except that 100 against against McGrath from 1995-2001.

 

2001-02

Then he goes to Zimbabwe and scores big. 388 unbeaten runs.
Then a good series in India but no hundred. 2 series against Aus, again no 100s.

Then Bangladesh series and again scores unbeaten 214.
After that 9 tests against Pakistan, SL, Eng and failures in both overseas tours of Eng and Pak with 1 100 in home tour.

 

2002-03
Then he hit a big series against WI with 700 runs. Those are his first 8 years of career, 71 tests.
During this phase he averaged in 30s against, Aus, Eng, Pak and SL.
Scoring 4k runs at avg of 41 against top 7 teams and that too at SR of 38 with just 7 100s meant he was just improving his reputation during later years as a batsman.

It's not difficult to see why he wasn't rated much. Of course he was just unstoppable during later years. But people initial impression of player remains for so long as cricket fans follow sports for decades.

 

Just like many batsmen who struggled during 1990-2002 and suddenly hit gold form in flattest era (2003-2013) of cricket, Kallis the batsman was one of the big time beneficiary of the that. 

kalis as a package is better because he can bowl and bat. he is a very good 5th bowler.

however, as a batsman alone, sachin is superior. I was wrong about it before. My general hatred towards sachin clouded my judgement. i do believe kalis wouldnt have average so high in drs, unbiased umpiring (cheating happens but to a lesser extent), no ball umpiring etc, better tech. 

he would still be great but not as effective. 

In saying that, the first name on my team sheet would be kalis purely cause he adds balance. 

Posted

From 2003 to WC 2011, with easy batting conditions so many batsmen averaged over 50, that difference wasn't huge among likes of Kallis, Sanga, Ponting, YK, 

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
JH Kallis (ICC/SA) 2003-2011 80 140 20 7492 201* 62.43 15167 49.39 29 29 5 824 59 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
KC Sangakkara (SL) 2003-2010 68 114 9 6370 287 60.66 11066 57.56 20 25 3 811 19 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
BC Lara (ICC/WI) 2003-2006 41 75 2 4381 400* 60.01 6968 62.87 16 11 7 549 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
DPMD Jayawardene (SL) 2003-2010 69 115 8 6176 374 57.71 11879 51.99 19 22 8 696 27 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Younis Khan (PAK) 2003-2011 41 76 6 4019 313 57.41 7295 55.09 12 14 9 481 14 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
RT Ponting (AUS) 2003-2010 89 160 16 8117 257 56.36 13437 60.40 25 39 8 930 44 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
SR Tendulkar (INDIA) 2003-2011 72 121 16 5881 248* 56.00 11037 53.28 20 24 4 713 26 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
V Sehwag (ICC/INDIA) 2003-2011 73 129 6 6822 319 55.46 8156 83.64 19 23 11 961 75 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Mohammad Yousuf (PAK) 2003-2010 48 87 7 4431 223 55.38 7876 56.25 14 17 5 559 32 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
S Chanderpaul (WI) 2003-2010 66 116 19 5165 203* 53.24 11611 44.48 16 27 8 562 23 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
R Dravid (ICC/INDIA) 2003-2011 81 141 16 6449 270 51.59 14714 43.82 17 31 6 808 12 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
VVS Laxman (INDIA) 2003-2011 76 126 24 5216 200* 51.13 10581 49.29 12 34 6 667 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
MEK Hussey (AUS) 2005-2011 59 103 12 4650 195 51.09 9589 48.49 13 24 9 532 22 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
GC Smith (ICC/SA) 2003-2011 84 148 8 7002 277 50.01 11607 60.32 21 27 9 887 22 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
ML Hayden (AUS) 2003-2009 66 122 10 5546 380 49.51 9141 60.67 18 19 7 663 46 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
KP Pietersen (ENG) 2005-2011 71 123 6 5666 227 48.42 9084 62.37 17 21 7 677 54 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AN Cook (ENG) 2006-2011 65 115 7 5130 235* 47.50 10466 49.01 16 24 3 596 5 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AB de Villiers (SA) 2004-2011 66 113 13 4741 278* 47.41 8821 53.74 12 23 2 538 37 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
MJ Clarke (AUS) 2004-2011 69 114 12 4742 168 46.49 8962 52.91 14 20 5 522 19 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
SM Katich (AUS) 2003-2010 55 97 5 4173 157 45.35 8435 49.47 10 25 4 487 9 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
CH Gayle (WI) 2003-2010 63 112 4 4785 333 44.30 7445 64.27 11 24 9 663 72 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
IR Bell (ENG) 2004-2011 62 106 11 4192 199 44.12 8283 50.60 12 26 7 483 18 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
RR Sarwan (WI) 2003-2009 54 95 3 4039 291 43.90 7774 51.95 14 17 5 526 12 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AJ Strauss (ENG) 2004-2011 82 147 6 6084 177 43.14 12116 50.21 19 24 12 753 10 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
PD Collingwood (ENG) 2003-2011 68 115 10 4259 206 40.56 9170 46.44 10 20 6 470 24
Posted
6 hours ago, anish2tweet said:

Dravid won more Test matches for us than Sachin, then I wonder why Sachin is being treated like God.
Poor second innings average means Sachin was not a match winner in crunch situations.

Sent from my CPH1819 using Tapatalk
 

 

Can you share number of matches won by both of them?

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

From 2003 to WC 2011, with easy batting conditions so many batsmen averaged over 50, that difference wasn't huge among likes of Kallis, Sanga, Ponting, YK, 

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
JH Kallis (ICC/SA) 2003-2011 80 140 20 7492 201* 62.43 15167 49.39 29 29 5 824 59 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
KC Sangakkara (SL) 2003-2010 68 114 9 6370 287 60.66 11066 57.56 20 25 3 811 19 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
BC Lara (ICC/WI) 2003-2006 41 75 2 4381 400* 60.01 6968 62.87 16 11 7 549 45 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
DPMD Jayawardene (SL) 2003-2010 69 115 8 6176 374 57.71 11879 51.99 19 22 8 696 27 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Younis Khan (PAK) 2003-2011 41 76 6 4019 313 57.41 7295 55.09 12 14 9 481 14 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
RT Ponting (AUS) 2003-2010 89 160 16 8117 257 56.36 13437 60.40 25 39 8 930 44 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
SR Tendulkar (INDIA) 2003-2011 72 121 16 5881 248* 56.00 11037 53.28 20 24 4 713 26 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
V Sehwag (ICC/INDIA) 2003-2011 73 129 6 6822 319 55.46 8156 83.64 19 23 11 961 75 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
Mohammad Yousuf (PAK) 2003-2010 48 87 7 4431 223 55.38 7876 56.25 14 17 5 559 32 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
S Chanderpaul (WI) 2003-2010 66 116 19 5165 203* 53.24 11611 44.48 16 27 8 562 23 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
R Dravid (ICC/INDIA) 2003-2011 81 141 16 6449 270 51.59 14714 43.82 17 31 6 808 12 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
VVS Laxman (INDIA) 2003-2011 76 126 24 5216 200* 51.13 10581 49.29 12 34 6 667 3 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
MEK Hussey (AUS) 2005-2011 59 103 12 4650 195 51.09 9589 48.49 13 24 9 532 22 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
GC Smith (ICC/SA) 2003-2011 84 148 8 7002 277 50.01 11607 60.32 21 27 9 887 22 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
ML Hayden (AUS) 2003-2009 66 122 10 5546 380 49.51 9141 60.67 18 19 7 663 46 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
KP Pietersen (ENG) 2005-2011 71 123 6 5666 227 48.42 9084 62.37 17 21 7 677 54 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AN Cook (ENG) 2006-2011 65 115 7 5130 235* 47.50 10466 49.01 16 24 3 596 5 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AB de Villiers (SA) 2004-2011 66 113 13 4741 278* 47.41 8821 53.74 12 23 2 538 37 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
MJ Clarke (AUS) 2004-2011 69 114 12 4742 168 46.49 8962 52.91 14 20 5 522 19 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
SM Katich (AUS) 2003-2010 55 97 5 4173 157 45.35 8435 49.47 10 25 4 487 9 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
CH Gayle (WI) 2003-2010 63 112 4 4785 333 44.30 7445 64.27 11 24 9 663 72 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
IR Bell (ENG) 2004-2011 62 106 11 4192 199 44.12 8283 50.60 12 26 7 483 18 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
RR Sarwan (WI) 2003-2009 54 95 3 4039 291 43.90 7774 51.95 14 17 5 526 12 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
AJ Strauss (ENG) 2004-2011 82 147 6 6084 177 43.14 12116 50.21 19 24 12 753 10 http://i.imgci.com/espncricinfo/guruInvestigate.gif
PD Collingwood (ENG) 2003-2011 68 115 10 4259 206 40.56 9170 46.44 10 20 6 470 24

what a joke era of flatties with no drs, no unbiased umpiring, no noball umpiring. 

Posted (edited)

I’d take Kallis easily  over Tendulkar as an all round cricketer. Honestly it’s not even close.


in fact Dravid vs Sachin is a closer comparison 

Edited by Rantzz
Posted

A Hyundai runs for 10 years, a Mercedes for 25.  Then you will have folks come along and pick the best handful of years of the Hyundai and compare them with the last couple of years of the Mercedes.  Not realizing that by even making that comparison they are shooting their own assertions in the foot.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rantzz said:

I’d take Kallis easily  over Tendulkar as an all round cricketer. Honestly it’s not even close.


in fact Dravid vs Sachin is a closer comparison 


At the end of the day, it is an easy pick 

 

At #4,

 

Sachin avg 51

Kallis avg 61 + bowling 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, anish2tweet said:

Dravid won more Test matches for us than Sachin, then I wonder why Sachin is being treated like God.
Poor second innings average means Sachin was not a match winner in crunch situations.

Sent from my CPH1819 using Tapatalk
 

 

Pujara too has won us more tests than Kohli has for sure. I wonder why Kohli has 180m insta followers. 

Posted
2 hours ago, sandeep said:

A Hyundai runs for 10 years, a Mercedes for 25.  Then you will have folks come along and pick the best handful of years of the Hyundai and compare them with the last couple of years of the Mercedes.  Not realizing that by even making that comparison they are shooting their own assertions in the foot.

 

 

You can buy benz but it will come with its own cost/emi. unless you are rich, you can't afford it much less pay for the better petrol and maintenance. And modern day benz comes with the same lifetime as hyundai. hyundai is better in indian cities than benz. somebody puts a scratch on it. no problem just leave them. Unless you are keeping with the joneses, you are better off with hyundai :nice:

Posted
7 hours ago, Jay said:

kalis as a package is better because he can bowl and bat. he is a very good 5th bowler.

however, as a batsman alone, sachin is superior. I was wrong about it before. My general hatred towards sachin clouded my judgement. i do believe kalis wouldnt have average so high in drs, unbiased umpiring (cheating happens but to a lesser extent), no ball umpiring etc, better tech. 

he would still be great but not as effective. 

In saying that, the first name on my team sheet would be kalis purely cause he adds balance. 

Superior? Sachin is only Super Power batsman we have seen. If NOT then Sachin pribably pulled biggest con with 1+ billion Indian public , all players of his era and allmost half billion other cricket fans aliong with cricket Pundits. That too for over two decades.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...