Jump to content

Ye kis angle se allrounder hai


ungboysj

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Sean Bradley said:

One Good IPL season and the guy is representing India in South Africa. by this standard, many players in the past deserved to play for India. The likes of Paul Valthaty, Swapnil Asnodkar, etc deserved chances because they had better IPL seasons than Venky Iyer in the past.

 

IPL has become the selection metric when it comes to Test, ODI and T20I teams... no first class cricket for two years using covid as a excuse.. this is the tatti result you get, one hit wonder IPL players who do well on flat wickets and small grounds- now we will see the true aukat of IPL quality in the Indian team, bits and pieces players, boring team to watch

Link to comment
2 hours ago, dilliboy said:

However much we ridicule him, pandya has been the only genuine seam bowling all rounder this country has produced since Kapil

Hope he works on his weird batting stance (if possible revert to his previous stance) during this break and comeback strong.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, rkt.india said:

V Iyer is a batting alrounder and vo bhi modern loi batsman hai. Give him some space. Don't go behind young players in their second games. His bowling is good enough for a sixth bowler.

Looking at his bowling he doesn't even seem a potential batting allrounder. More like a batsman who could just roll his arm over for the sake of it. Will be happy to be proven wrong.

Edited by Pollack
Link to comment
10 hours ago, Sean Bradley said:

One Good IPL season and the guy is representing India in South Africa. by this standard, many players in the past deserved to play for India. The likes of Paul Valthaty, Swapnil Asnodkar, etc deserved chances because they had better IPL seasons than Venky Iyer in the past.

He averages 48 in domestic one day cricket at sr of 105 after 30+ games. So, no, it's not based on just IPL. IPL just brought him into limelight. Regarding Valthaty, Asnodkar, their domestic performances weren't anything to talk about.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, putrevus said:

There is no such thing called batting allrounder unless you are Kallis class and to extent Stokes.

 

Guys like Iyers and 3D player from Tamil Nadu, I forgot his name, he is another useless guy.

 

Unless they are top order batsmen and can walk into team as batsman , there is no point in picking these bits and pieces players.

V Iyer can walk in the team as a batsman. He mostly played for KKR as a batsman. His bowling is just an outside help. Still bowls -130ish pace. There aren't many domestic batsmen who average 48 at an SR of 105 in List A cricket. People are just talking About IPL ignoring his domestic performances.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Vijy said:

kohli could have been a useful bowler. didn't bowl enough.

 

I think it was a selfish act on his behalf.

 

The guy can obviously bowl part time and I always felt he didnt so as to preserve his "aura" on the cricket field, ie great batsmen and great fielder. He didnt want to have a facet of the game where he was exposed.

 

Compare that to the Indian side 10-15 years ago, we had SRT, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj who all could bowl and have even won MoM performances for their bowling alone.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...